Airlines are a fortune on this issue. If not allowed to bring drinks at a level that should not be forced to be free instead of paying ridiculously high costs? I know why liquids are prohibited, I live in England also. My argument is that if we get forced to drink from both airports in shops or with the airline to buy, be reached by air, which actually should be allowed to charge such exorbitant prices? Flying from England to France, we find drinks costs about 5 € to fuck 150mls. The airlines themselves can not be responsible for extreme safety standards must keep up, but not to use a monopoly on good-paying passengers through the nose or going to run without it.
not the airlines, the FAA and if anyone should blame the terrorists want to be
The ratio of the current ban of liquids is quite extensive, from what I heard, when presented weltweit.Es was really good reasons, here in London, United Kingdom, is an ongoing study where the defendants are alleged to have asked explosives in drink schmuggeln.Für more information, see the following:-http: / / news. BBC. co. uk/1/hi/uk/7329221. stm
Poe Bird I think the airlines to reap a fortune for this, although the FAA ban on liquids in our own Sicherheit.Stellen Before traveling on Spirit Airlines have to pay $ 2. 00 for a can of soda or a bottle of water, probably could get. 85 cents. That’s ridiculous.
I apple juice free on all flights I am on. I could give you a drink, if you bought it after it went through security? And the rules are not an airline rule, which is and security prevails. Airlines have no choice.